🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.